Kill the Internet Essay

Kill the Internet-and Other Anti-SOPA Myths EssayThe Article Kill the Internet-and Other Anti-SOPA Myths by Danny Goldberg introduces PIPA(Protect Intellectual Property Act) for online piracy on the lucre. This situation is connected to the copyright piracy as well. The issue in this essay is the common problem of make articles and links beingness copied and pasted from people off the internet and getting credit for another persons work. In this case I hold with the SOPA because copyright is not to be credited for those who dont do their own work. To me, it is a guidance for help not coping. Coping someones work is not helping the situation and takes the away the opportunity of the author to get credit.One reason to my decision on agreeing is the leading affect of modern voices and outlets of skillful writers work is being taken into someone elses work. According to the Politics website, the legislation would allow copyright holders and the justice Department to seek court of j ustice orders against websites associated with copyright infringement. To the legislative, they believe that the copyright holders chances of winning is not very high. They see coping as a threat to publishers and should be banned even if internet websites lose business.A second reason that got me to agree was a account made by Clay Shirkys assistant in the book The McGraw-Hill Guide. many another(prenominal) believe that copyright isnt coping if the creator doesnt lose profit because nothing physical isnt taken from them, Clay Shirkys assistant. This statement is false reasoning because even if the authors profit isnt lost, the fact that their heavy work is being copied by someone else doesnt make things alright. The publisher worked hard on the writing they published to the internet and it shouldnt be taken advantage of. People need to realize that victorious others work isnt a very clever idea because your only hurting yourself by fetching other peoples credit. Its the sam e as someone taking a movie that a director worked hard to become public and then has to find out their credit was copied by another person and is being used or is being taken ownershipby that person. Because of this problem many websites are losing their businesses for links and articles of authors are declining their work to be on the internet. For this I believe the SOPA is making the right decision and should proceed in protecting the internet uses.All in all copyright should have been prohibited a long time ago. For those whose work is being taken out of context and losing credit isnt fair. SOPA and PIPA industries should feel good about themselves for finally taking action and stopping internet copiers on the websites available to the people.ResourcesThe Politics WebsiteThe Nation WebsiteThe McGraw-Hill Guide book